Cases 121 - 130 of 46,743
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Latoya Hughes and Richard Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robb v. Syngenta Corp Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01250
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
William Robb
Defendant:
Syngenta Corp Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01252
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lawson
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lockett v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01253
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Alston Lockett
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wachter v. Nickel et al
as 3:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Andrew Nickel and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
