Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Legette v. Warden FCI-Greenville
as 3:2021cv01768
Petitioner:
Jammy Derone Legette
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Greenville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romero Galindez v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Romero Galindez
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, K. Schneider, FCI Greenville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strouse v. USA et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
John Does 1-200, Warden - FCI Greenville, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
James Strouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. Werlich et al
as 3:2019cv01340
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Central-Washington DC, Warden Werlich and FCI-Greenville
Petitioner:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Due v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv01218
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Associate Warden Messer, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bureau of Prisons Central et al
as 3:2019cv01168
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, Associate Warden Messer, Lt John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2019cv01161
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Warden Werlich, Fasil Vakil Ahmed, FCI Greenville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Directors et al
as 3:2018cv01989
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Directors and Warden of FCI - Terre Haute
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ray Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whiteman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv01652
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Williams, FCI Danbury and others
Petitioner:
Robert J. Whiteman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whiteman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv01653
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Williams, FCI Danbury and others
Petitioner:
Robert J. Whiteman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
