Cases 11 - 20 of 1,514
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zhu et al v. Keeley & Sons, Inc., et al
as 3:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Yafeng Zhu and Shuhui Zhang
Defendant:
Keeley & Sons, Inc., a for-profit corporation, Eugene Keeley, The Kilian Corporation, a for-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Montanez v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Montanez
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Bob Blum, Angela Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Flakes
Defendant:
David W. Mitchell, Michael T. Bailey, Brandon Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and David Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
