Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robbins v. Werlich
as 3:2018cv00145
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lee Robbins
Respondent:
T. G. Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lindsey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lindsey , Albert Jones , Brian Margulis and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
Brandon Anthony, Jeanette Hecht, Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Brammlet
as 3:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
Bradd Brammlet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv01285
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
Anthony, Phelps, Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51838
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kendrick
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
Rick Harrington, Kimberly Butler, Rednour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv10812
Plaintiff:
Whitley Kendrick
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Berlex Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamison et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Jamison , Edward Jarrell , Edward Jesse and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Boyd et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd , Paul Lee and Kendrick Pearson
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez and Randy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
