Cases 21 - 30 of 733
Winston v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Scott Spurlock, Misty Adkins, Zachery Schelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohn v. Does et al
as 3:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bohn
Defendant:
Jane Does and Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Anderton et al
as 3:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Khorey J. Anderton, Lieutenant McBride, Kay Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Taylor, Tara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Crain et al
as 3:2023cv03776
Plaintiff:
Jerome Howard
Defendant:
Angela Crain, Wexford Health Source, Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2023cv03559
Plaintiff:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Charles J Karisch, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Texas et al
as 3:2023cv03550
Not Classified By Court:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Waller County Texas, David Mace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
Jim F. Lanier
Defendant:
Richard Watson and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2023cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ayande Andrews
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jiggets v. The Collegial Review Process et al
as 3:2023cv03348
Plaintiff:
Wesley Jiggets
Defendant:
The Collegial Review Process, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
