Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Henderson v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Erica Henderson
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane US, Inc. , Crane Co. , Velan Valve Corp and others
Cross_defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Knasinski et al v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerome Knasinski and Janet Knasinski
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cross_claimant:
Brand Insulations, Inc. , ITT Corporation , Trane US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Steven Watts
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carver Pump Company , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Steven Watts , Carver Pump Company , 84 Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Horch et al v 3M Company et al
as 3:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Robert C Horch and Lois Horch
Defendant:
3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hager v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hager
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Crane Company , Georgia Pacific, LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hasenberg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01325
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Cummins Inc., Georgia Pacific, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Hasenberg, Jr. and Linda Hasenberg
Cross Defendant:
Kelsey-Hayes Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pneumo Abex LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Byers et al v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Larry Byers and Delberta Byers
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Graham et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2013cv01219
Plaintiff:
Donald Graham and Rosemary Graham
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , Brand Insulations Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fanelli v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
William Fanelli
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Trane US, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
Counter_defendant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schwindt et al v. A.B.B., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00996
Plaintiff:
Arnold Schwindt and Maritza Schwindt
Defendant:
A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. , Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation , A.B.B., Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
