Cases 1 - 10 of 854
Pena v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brainlife LLC v Beekeeper's Naturals, Inc., et al
as 3:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Brainlife LLC (d/b/a "Brain Fuel")
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Johnson v. Sadler et al
as 3:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson
Defendant:
B. Sadler, Wexford Corporate, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seats v. Doty et al
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Devin C. Seats
Defendant:
B Doty, Anthony Wills and Lt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Willie B Bates, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Gregory
as 3:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Fredd B. Mitchell
Defendant:
Dennis A. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
