Cases 1 - 10 of 789
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Rob Jeffreys, J. B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Reid et al
as 3:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Lt. Reid, C/O Khobe, Warden Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv01537
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Warden - FCI Greenville et al
as 3:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Kari Ann Peters
Defendant:
Warden - FCI Greenville, Amber Fitzpatrick and Ms. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Szpila v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Warden Kimberly, Christel Crow, Placement Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudder v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv01363
Petitioner:
Jarrod Rudder
Respondent:
Warden and Nurse Mindi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Willie B Bates, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
