Cases 1 - 10 of 790
Sams v. Aarons Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff, Joseph Kraus and Aarons Inc.
Plaintiff:
Niquita Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sudroff v. The Family & Social Services Administration
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
David Michael Sudroff
Defendant:
The Family & Social Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabernacle Church Joint Board et al v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ezell Foster, Tabernacle Church Joint Board, Antonio R Daggett Sr. and others
Defendant:
Takenya Julkes, Roy L Davis, Princella Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
McGill et al v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Kelvin McGill and Pamela Horne
Defendant:
City of Hammond Indiana and Hammond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. YouTube
as 2:2024cv00232
Defendant:
YouTube
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moses v. Brooks et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Collins, Brooks, Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Randol Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
