Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge Andrew Rodovich
Cases 1 - 10 of 773
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Sonya Winkler
Defendant: David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Adrienne Bundy
Defendant: Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Hawk v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant: Indiana State of, Kosciusko County and Kosciusko County Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vowal v. Martinez Jr et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: Williman Mescall, Willeman Forgey, Oscar Martinez Jr and others
Plaintiff: Patricia Vowal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bundy v. Dollar Tree
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Adrienne Bundy
Defendant: Dollar Tree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Caparelli v. Town of Merrillville et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: Alycia Caparelli
Defendant: Town of Merrillville, Lt. James Bogner, Dr. Zhuo Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?