Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Red v. Nevels et al
as 2:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Reggie Nevels and Todd Fleece
Plaintiff:
Michael Red
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sample v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 2:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Mr. Bodlovich, Indiana State Prison, Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v Steptoe, et al
as 2:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Brian T Gensel, County of Porter, Porter Regional Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christopher Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v Indiana State of
as 4:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
Eric D Morrow
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Melissa Kohne, Denise Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mireles et al v. Blackford County Security Center et al
as 1:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mireles, III and Emma Y Brunot
Defendant:
Blackford County Security Center, Blackford County Prosecutors Office, J Nicholas Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Tippecanoe County Jail
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mathew Howard
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Henderson et al
as 3:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barker
Defendant:
Deanna Henderson, Rick Schwartz, Sally Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Brock et al
as 3:2008cv00270
Plaintiff:
John K Adams
Defendant:
Eric Koslke, Robert Hill, Dr Danny Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKinney v. Archey et al
as 1:2008cv00112
Defendant:
Sheriff Otis Archey, Cpl Sudgart, Sgt Randy Abertson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P McKinney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. Widup et al
as 2:2007cv00434
Plaintiff:
Errick Rashod Hawkins
Defendant:
John J Widup, David R Murtaugh and David E Lain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
