Cases 51 - 60 of 553
Ward v. Westville Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv00687
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility and Westville Correctional
Plaintiff:
Tyler John Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Segal et al
as 3:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Defendant:
Jeff Segal and Oblinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Michael J Wilson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. USA
as 2:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shelton v. East Chicago the City of et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Julius Shelton
Defendant:
East Chicago the City of, East Chicago Police Department, Jose Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crockett v. Warden
as 4:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
William B Crockett, III, William Bernard Crockett, William Crockett III and others
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cearo v. Sheriff
as 2:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Jimmie Alfonzo Cearo III and Jimmie Alfonzo Cearo, III
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Hughes
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicolas B Martinez
Defendant:
Shay J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Lee Mobley
Defendant:
Robert A Goldsmith, Thomas Lehman and Kari Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. USA
as 2:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Rita Law
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
