Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sutton v. Wisconsin Central. Ltd.
as 2:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Domonic Sutton
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hillebold v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 2:2016cv00528
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Hillebold
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Christensen v Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Michael Christensen
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
Rucker et al v. RDS Farm Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
William T Rucker and Marie Rucker
Defendant:
RDS Farm Inc , David L Allen , National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross_defendant:
RDS Farm Inc and David L Allen
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Ronald Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Johnson v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company et al
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Johnson
Defendant:
Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company and Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lightfoot v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
James W Lightfoot
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc
as 2:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Adam Stephens
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
Sparks v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Sparks
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ronald Ward v. Soo Line Railroad Company et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ward
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company and Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Briggs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Scott M Briggs
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
