Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund et al v. American Paving Services Inc.
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund, TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO. 142 TRAINING AND APPRENTICESHIP TRUST FUND, Trustees of the Teamsters Union Local No 142 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
American Paving Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Pension Fund et al v. Best Brickwashing, LLC
as 2:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Pension Fund and Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Best Brickwashing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hernandez et al v. Landmark Sign Partners, LLC
as 2:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Felipe H. Hernandez, Alec Davis, Frank Mikolajczyk and others
Defendant:
Landmark Sign Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
The Trustees of the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund et al v. CRI Construction Services, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
The Trustees of the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund - Lake County and Vicinity; and, The Trustees of the Construction Workers HRA Trust Fund - Lake County and Vicinity, The Trustees of the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
CRI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Pension Fund et al v. Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Pension Fund and Trustees Of the Bricklayers Union Local No. 6 Of Indiana Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Williams v. Noble Home Health Care, LLC
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Williams
Defendant:
Noble Home Health Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Indiana State Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. United Flooring, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Indiana/Kentucky/Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Indiana/Kentucky/Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Defined Contribution Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
United Flooring, Inc., Jack Laurie Floors, LLC doing business as Jack Laurie Group and Jack Laurie Floors, LLC doing business as Jack Laurie Group, an Indiana Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund Lake County and Vicinity et al v. American Paving Services Inc
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, and, TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS OF LAKE COUNTY HRA TRUST FUND and Trustees of the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund Lake County and Vicinity
Defendant:
AMERICAN PAVING SERVICES, INC and American Paving Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rybicki v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rybicki
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund et al v. C.N.B. Construction LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund, TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO. 142 TRAINING AND APPRENTICESHIP TRUST FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO. 142 ANNUITY FUND
Defendant:
C.N.B. Construction LLC and SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
Carlos Bernal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
