Cases 21 - 30 of 363
Savado v. Kozora et al
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Savado
Defendant:
P.O. Christopher Kozora, P.O. Jay Diggins, Christopher Kozora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Comcast Business
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Comcast Business
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn v. Ernest
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Andre Vaughn
Defendant:
P.O. Ernest #470 and Ernest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connolly v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Noreen Connolly
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Jennifer Prokop and Todd Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haug et al v. Starke County
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Haug and Anita Haug
Defendant:
Starke County and Starke County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruffin El v. Parent
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruffin El and Michael Ruffin Jr
Defendant:
Bruce Parent, Lake County and McColly Real Estate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Latham v. Sauls et al
as 2:2023cv20000
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Latham
Defendant:
Tiffany Sauls and Mark Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FOP Lodge 59 et al v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
FOP LODGE 59, BRANDON HOLZHAUER and John Richmond
Defendant:
Jose Rivera, CITY OF EAST CHICAGO and East Chicago City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v Portage Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ann Green and Robert Michael Nagel
Defendant:
Portage Police Department, Ofc. Robert D Nichols and Robert Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Kay et al
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Quentin Raphael Owens
Defendant:
Kay, American Amicable Insurance Co., Woodforest Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
