Cases 61 - 70 of 845
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dakwon Johnson and Antoine Morris
Defendant:
Jeffery Sanchez and City of East Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolling v. Gary Common Council et al
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bolling
Defendant:
Gary Common Council, Michelle Fajman and Lake County Board of Elections and Registration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Silich v. Obermiller et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVID SILICH
Defendant:
BRANDON OBERMILLER, JAMES WESLEY, III RICHARDSON, JOSEPH D CLEMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hawkins et al v. Fagan
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hawkins and Anthony McClintock
Defendant:
Sean Fagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle v. Indiana Packers et al
as 4:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Brandon C Doyle
Defendant:
Indiana Packers, Ruben Hernandez, JC Pratter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin, Jr. v. City of East Chicago et al
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Irvin, Jr.
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, Benjamin Lopez, III and Michael LaPorta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kazmierczak v. Parry et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Kyle A. Kazmierczak
Defendant:
Duane Parry and Michigan City Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
