Cases 31 - 40 of 1,048
Romo et al v. East Chicago Indiana et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teresa Romo, Jose Romo-Caballero and Jose Romo Caballero
Defendant:
East Chicago Indiana, Charles Hicks and John Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McClelland v. Bigham et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mr Dwayne McClelland and Dwayne McClelland
Defendant:
John Bigham, Unknown Officers of the Hammond Police Department, City of Hammond Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shefulsky v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Curt Shefulsky
Defendant:
City of Gary, Gary Police Department and Gary City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez-Puentes v. Cook et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez-Puentes
Defendant:
Kayvionne Cook, Jose Rivera and Hector Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Terrell v. Indiana Police Department eg. et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Defendant:
Ronnie Terrell, Indiana Police Department eg. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
