Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Swick v. Comcast Business
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Comcast Business
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carteaux v. Rome City Town of et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
BRAD A CARTEAUX and Brad A. Carteaux
Defendant:
TOWN OF ROME CITY, TOWN OF WOLCOTTVILLE, NOBLE COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Slater v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Cortrez D Slater
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Loretta H Rush, Tom Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Bray v. Shiparski et al
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant:
OFFICER Kyle Shiparski, OFFICER WILLIE HENDERSON, OFFICER Adam Brinkman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Tague
as 1:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marlin D Adams
Defendant:
L Tague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Bohdan et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Plaintiff:
Marlin D Adams
Defendant:
John Bohdan, Jason C Custer and Nathan McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 365 et al v. City of East Chicago, Indiana et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jesus Cuadra, Michael Martinez, Paul Russell and others
Defendant:
Anthony Serna, City of East Chicago, Indiana, Anthony Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teeple v. Adams County Regional Sewer District
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Adams County Regional Sewer District
Plaintiff:
Connie Teeple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
