Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mysti Valencia
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Andrews v. Jonesboro, Indiana
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jason Andrews
Defendant:
Jonesboro, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews Jr. v. Bokota et al
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leon E Andrews Jr.
Defendant:
Natalie Bokota, Kathleen A. Sullivan, Mark Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Byerline v. Murriel
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Andrew Byerline and Benjamin A Byerline
Defendant:
Sara Murriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cox v. Cox
as 1:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hamilton Cox
Defendant:
Wendy Anne Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
