Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Inmates of St Joe County et al v. Lawson
as 3:2019cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Winters, Robin Dale Kilgore Peppers, S Ortiz-R and others
Defendant:
Julie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wexford Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Ian Clark and Ian J Clark
Defendant:
Dan Lunde, Wexford Indiana LLC, Dr Nancy Marthakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltz v. LaGrange County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Estate_plaintiff:
Cathy J Stoltz
Defendant:
LaGrange County Sheriff , Sgt Tim Clark , Scott Rowlison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Clark
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. IDOC et al
as 3:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Justin S Clark
Defendant:
IDOC and Miami Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Griffin et al
as 2:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Defendant:
K Griffin, L Tucker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Justin James Eugene Clark
Defendant:
Superintendent and Chaplin Blumber
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Facility Executive Director et al
as 3:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Justin James Eugene Clark
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Facility Executive Director, Assistant Executive Director, Slayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Warden
as 3:2017cv00475
Petitioner:
Ian J Clark
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Blumber et al
as 3:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Justin James Eugene Clark
Defendant:
Chaplin Blumber and Superintendent
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
