Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Shelton v. East Chicago the City of et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Julius Shelton
Defendant:
East Chicago the City of, East Chicago Police Department, Jose Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tesky v. Putnamville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan Tesky
Defendant:
Putnamville Correctional Facility, Dunn, M Morris and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00295
Petitioner:
Anthony Morris Wheeler and Anthony Wheeler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Love v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael J Love and Michael Love
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, Tiffiny Turner, Buckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte' v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
April Cider, Deputies, Indiana Senator and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Hayden et al
as 3:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Clint Richardson
Defendant:
T. Hayden, D Williams, D. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Sheriff of Allen County et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA and SHERIFF OF ALLEN COUNTY
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Warden
as 3:2019cv01068
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
Charles Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv01073
Defendant:
Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept, Beau Holcomb and Matthew Hassel
Plaintiff:
Jamal D Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00998
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Worth and Miller
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Morris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
