Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Burton v. South Bend Parole District #8 et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Burton
Defendant:
South Bend Parole District #8, Redding and Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Redding
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Redding
as 3:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Gibson and Jason Gibson
Defendant:
Kevin Redding
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Redding
as 3:2020cv00519
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Gibson and Jason Gibson
Defendant:
Kevin Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 3:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00521
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Red v. Nevels et al
as 2:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Reggie Nevels and Todd Fleece
Plaintiff:
Michael Red
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Red v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Reggie Nevels and Todd Fleece
Plaintiff:
Michael Red
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
