Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 91 - 100 of 101
Haury v. Sevier
as 3:2011cv00127
Plaintiff: Michael Hunter Haury
Defendant: Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rapier v. Lemmon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00083
Plaintiff: Ricky Joe Rapier
Defendant: Bruce Lemmon, Mark Sevier and Sgt Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatman v. Buame et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00069
Plaintiff: Cary Tatman
Defendant: Derek Buame , Henry , Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clinton v. Buss et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00467
Plaintiff: James Earl Clinton
Defendant: Edwin Buss, Correctional Medical Services, Lynn Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Sevier
as 3:2010cv00262
Petitioner: Richard Gardner
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopkins v. Sevier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00142
Plaintiff: Kevin E Hopkins
Defendant: Mark Sevier, Ms Robinson, Mrs Poquecum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felder v. Sevier
as 4:2010cv00009
Petitioner: John B Felder
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunch v. Sevier
as 3:2009cv00455
Petitioner: Jeffery D Bunch
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hegwood-Metcalf v. Sevier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00453
Plaintiff: George Hegwood-Metcalf and George Hegwood-Metcalf
Defendant: Mark Sevier and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2008cv00604
Plaintiff: Clarence Stout
Defendant: Indiana Department of Correction, J D Donahue, Mark Sevier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?