Cases 11 - 20 of 26
McDandal v. Lewton et al
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Dr. Mitcheff, Harvil, David E Leonard and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan McDandal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Nolan et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Discover Bank, Rhame & Elwood, State of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
McDandal v. Liaw et al
as 3:2018cv00732
Plaintiff:
Nolan McDandal
Defendant:
Dr Liaw and Mr Harvil
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDandal v. Sevier et al
as 3:2018cv00606
Defendant:
Mrs Cornett, Mr Mark Sevier, Mrs Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan McDandal
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lois Nolan
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rust v. Pyke et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Rust
Defendant:
Nolan D Pyke, Laura M Clouser, Thomas R Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCreary v. Ingram et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Charles M McCreary
Defendant:
Jessica Ingram, Nolan E Banks, Daniel Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollan v. Parnell et al
as 2:2013cv00052
Defendant:
Willie Parnell, Stacey Nolan, Dawn Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Hollon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary v. McCann et al
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael McCreary
Defendant:
Daniel Ingram, Jessica Ingram, Nolan E Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Steven Nolan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
