Cases 1 - 10 of 40,903
WEST BEND INSURANCE COMPANY v. BENSON et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
WEST BEND INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DANIEL BENSON, JANET BENSON and NEWTON & SONS EXCAVATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Riley v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Riley
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1989 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kratzman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Wendy S Kratzman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
American Technology Components, Inc. et al v. Ayro, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
American Technology Components, Inc. and ATC Molding, LLC d/b/a LePark Mold & Tool
Defendant:
Ayro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Horine v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Brenda Horine
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP d/b/a Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arble v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Arble
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00404
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
