General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Debra Lynch
Cases 1 - 10 of 850
CROCKETT v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2022cv02045
Petitioner: WILLIAM CROCKETT
Respondent: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ISON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01945
Petitioner: JASON ISON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLOVER v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv01870
Petitioner: JUSTIN SLOVER
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELLOWS v. PRETORIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01862
Petitioner: AARON FELLOWS
Respondent: PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. SEVIER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01774
Petitioner: MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SISSON v. FORESTAL
as 1:2022cv01725
Petitioner: IVY R. SISSON
Respondent: KERRY J. FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENSON v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv01614
Petitioner: CHARLES A. BENSON
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01498
Plaintiff: STEPHEN P. SMITH
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOEL JR. v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01503
Petitioner: JAMES FRANK NOEL JR.
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLATO v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv01483
Petitioner: ROBERT J. PLATO, JR.
Respondent: MARK SEVIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?