Cases 31 - 40 of 3,720
DOSSETT v SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01521
Petitioner:
BRENDA DOSSETT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AUSHERMAN v. W.V.C.F.
as 2:2017cv00211
Petitioner:
JACOB D. AUSHERMAN
Respondent:
W.V.C.F.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOWNSEND v. CATECKY
as 1:2017cv01513
Respondent:
S. CATECKY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JAMES TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. USA
as 1:2017cv01498
Petitioner:
BRUCE JONES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FARLEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01463
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
JONELL RENEE FARLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HORNS v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00204
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS HORNS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TOLLE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01442
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY TOLLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SEYMORE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01404
Petitioner:
LAMONT A. SEYMORE, III
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA FOOTBALL, INC. v. U.S. FEDERATION OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL
as 1:2017cv01395
Defendant:
U.S. FEDERATION OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL
Plaintiff:
USA FOOTBALL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
