Cases 71 - 80 of 454
WASHINGTON v. VENGROFF WILLIAMS, INC.
as 1:2015cv00210
Defendant:
VENGROFF WILLIAMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DINNER BELL MARKETS, INC., #233 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 1:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
DINNER BELL MARKETS, INC., #233
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRADEN v. GLA COLLECTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2014cv01953
Plaintiff:
VASHA BRADEN
Defendant:
GLA COLLECTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VARELLAS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2014cv00322
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. VARELLAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUSPON v. GLOBAL TEL-LINK CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv01514
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL-LINK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.