Cases 81 - 90 of 454
DEAN v. SYNCHRONY BANK F/K/A GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
as 2:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
SARAH DEAN
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TAIYA et al v. FRACTIONAL VILLAS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
B.R., S.R., SHEVELEV TAIYA and others
Defendant:
FRACTIONAL VILLAS, INC., BARBARA VICINO, ROBERT VICINO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GREENE et al v. PASSAGES HOSPICE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Defendant:
CRAIG J. FRANK, MICHAEL GILLMAN, SETH GILLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY GREENE, KRISTA GRUBER, ANN MCKENZIE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00691
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KUHLMAN v. WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO, L.P.A.
as 1:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
CHRIS KUHLMAN
Defendant:
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO, L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BADOLATO v. ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2014cv00060
Defendant:
ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD BADOLATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
