Cases 1 - 10 of 20
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF MARTINSVILLE et al
as 1:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARTINSVILLE and JOHN RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
KEMP v. SMPRETTY, INC.
as 1:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KEMP
Defendant:
SMPRETTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NEELEY v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01887
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. NEELEY, JR.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
SIMPSON v. APEX EXPRESS, INC.
as 1:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Apex Express, Inc. d/b/a Cordell Transportation Company, LLC and APEX EXPRESS, INC. doing business as CORDELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
PALOMAR v. SMC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv04693
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PALOMAR, DANTE HUTTON, TAYLOR KIRBY and others
Defendant:
SMC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. HOSPICE ADVANTAGE MIDCO, LLC
as 1:2019cv04165
Plaintiff:
MONICA BROWN
Defendant:
HOSPICE ADVANTAGE MIDCO, LLC and HOSPICE ADVANTAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANTHONY v. LEADERS MOVING COMPANY
as 1:2018cv03202
Plaintiff:
BRYCE ANTHONY
Defendant:
LEADERS MOVING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EDWARDS v. MENARD, INC.
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. EDWARDS
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GUNN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01668
Plaintiff:
ANGELA GUNN
Defendant:
TRAVIS KALANICK and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SECREASE v. WESTERN & SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. et al
as 1:2015cv00742
Defendant:
STEVEN BIBI, JUANITA THOMAS and WESTERN & SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NEAL D. SECREASE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
