Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TRUCK COUNTRY OF INDIANA, INC. et al v. DAIMLER VANS USA, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
TRUCK COUNTRY OF INDIANA, INC. and TRUCK CENTERS, INC.
Defendant:
DAIMLER VANS USA, LLC and MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOOR 2 DOOR FLOORS, LLC v. BEAUTIFUL SURFACES INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01136
Plaintiff:
DOOR 2 DOOR FLOORS, LLC, DOOR, GARAGE KINGS CANADA and others
Defendant:
MIKE WISEMEN, DRAKE MYERS, TIM FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEAKS OF VIRGINIA, LLC v. STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2018cv01048
Defendant:
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEAKS OF VIRGINIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC. v. MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
as 3:2015cv00022
Defendant:
MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC. v. MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
as 3:2015cv02200
Defendant:
MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC. v. MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
as 3:2015cv00022
Defendant:
MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGOVSKY ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
YUMMY YOGURT INDY, LLC et al v. ORANGE LEAF LICENSING, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01800
Plaintiff:
YUMMY YOGURT INDY, LLC, ADITI 3 YUMMY YOGURT, LLC, CHINTU PATEL and others
Defendant:
OL ADDISON HOLDINGS, LLC, OL AUSTIN, LLC, OL BOSSIER CITY HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BAK v. HOME VIDEO FRANCHISING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv01196
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BAK
Defendant:
HOME VIDEO FRANCHISING CORPORATION, HOME VIDEO STUDIO, INC., ROBERT HANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
