General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Richard Young
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,271
YOUNG v. FORESTALL
as 1:2022cv01079
Petitioner: JONATHAN PSI YOUNG
Respondent: K. FORESTALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner: DAVID JONES
Respondent: DAVID MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEENEY v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00064
Petitioner: CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLLANDSWORTH v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00065
Petitioner: JEREMY HOLLANDSWORTH
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00059
Petitioner: JOHN ERIC WARREN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUMNER v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 3:2022cv00057
Petitioner: SHANE A. SUMNER
Respondent: DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUIROZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv00873
Petitioner: Eriberto Quiroz
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMAYA MARTINEZ v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner: LUIS ALONZO AMAYA MARTINEZ
Respondent: DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLE v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00046
Petitioner: JONATHAN P. COLE
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MADDEN v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv00724
Petitioner: DARREN MADDEN
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?