Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Richard Young
Cases 81 - 90 of 443
GRAY v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 1:2018cv01005
Defendant: ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., HUBERT DUNCAN, K M SIMONE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIRBY v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. (IMPD)
as 1:2018cv00857
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. (IMPD)
Plaintiff: JUSTIN R. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF VINCENNES IN
as 3:2018cv00042
Defendant: GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF VINCENNES IN
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYANT v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2018cv00342
Plaintiff: ELMER BRYANT
Defendant: C. A. PENFOLD and WARDEN
Miscellaneou: WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant: KATHY ALVEY and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff: NATHAN BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILFORD v. MAXWELL
as 3:2017cv00126
Defendant: BRIAN MAXWELL
Plaintiff: GEORGE MILFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PACHMAYR
as 1:2017cv02778
Plaintiff: JAMES J. JOHNSON
Defendant: GREGORY PACHMAYR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00123
Defendant: WARDEN DICK BROWN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MIFFLEN and others
Plaintiff: EDDY BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK v. TURPIN et al
as 3:2017cv00115
Plaintiff: PATRICK SCOTT BLACK
Defendant: CHAD FERGUSON, NICHOLAS HERMANN, BRIAN TURPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOUGLAS v. BOTTOMS
as 3:2017cv00056
Defendant: TIM BOTTOMS
Plaintiff: CHARLES DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?