Cases 21 - 30 of 1,276
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Geva v. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Leeor Geva
Defendant:
PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SWEIGERT v. BENASSI et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
D.G. SWEIGERT
Defendant:
MATTHEW BENASSI, U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, U.S. COAST GUARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NEVIL v. WILSON et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN M. NEVIL
Defendant:
LAURRE B. WILSON, BRENT M. MACER and JILLIAN N. KRATOCHVIL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception of Wire or Oral Communications
HOOD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C HOOD and THOMAS C. HOOD
Defendant:
INC. CSX TRANSPORTATION and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
THOMAS v. KOHL'S, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
