Cases 31 - 40 of 88
ARCHIE v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00903
Plaintiff:
VICKIE LYNN ARCHIE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FAULK v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00795
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TINA M. FAULK
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCOTT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00091
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TRENA N. SCOTT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GREEN v. COLVIN
as 1:2012cv01875
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LINDA F. GREEN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TUDOR v. COLVIN
as 1:2012cv01773
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ANDREW L. TUDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STANSBERRY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01334
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICK E. STANSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WOOD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01293
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
TANYA WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WALKER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01285
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
PAMELA K. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HAGGARD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01263
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
BECKY G. HAGGARD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILLER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01106
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CATHY S. MILLER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
