Cases 51 - 60 of 442
SCHWEITZER v. PRIME COMMS RETAIL, LLC
as 4:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
RITA SCHWEITZER
Defendant:
PRIME COMMS RETAIL, LLC dba AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SCHWEITZER v. PRIME COMMS RETAIL, LLC
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Rita Schweitzer
Defendant:
Prime Comms Retail, LLC and PRIME COMMS RETAIL, LLC dba AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOE et al v. NETFLIX, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, JANET ROE and JANICE COE
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC and Blumhouse Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
IVY v. TRAVELERS INS. CO. et al
as 1:2022cv01228
Plaintiff:
LYNDALE R. IVY
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INS. CO. and DANIEL M. WITTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
MOORE v. SPEEDWAY, LLC
as 1:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
DELORA MOORE
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
LOWRY v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LOWRY
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
COOPER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Ms. DEBRA COOPER and DEBRA COOPER
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MAYOR JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
HOBBS v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE LLC
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hobbs
Defendant:
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
OLSON v. FEDEX CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
CAMERON OLSON
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WHITAKER v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WHITAKER
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
