Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CHASTEEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CHASTEEN and CONSTANCE CHASTEEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LOPEZ v. NATOLI et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROMAN NATOLI and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
BYRD v. RICHARD ROUDEBUSH VA MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
BAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
RICHARD ROUDEBUSH VA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
MOSLEY v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
JERRY WAYNE MOSLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. SOCAS et al
as 1:2021cv01936
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
DR. JUAN SOCAS, IU HEALTH UNIV HOSPITAL and IU HEALTH UNIV HOSPITAL Domestic Nonprofit Corp doing business as INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
SARAH DAY and SARAH E. DAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HENSLEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02399
Plaintiff:
JARED HENSLEY and SEASON HENSLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MARTIN v. STATE FARM et al
as 1:2020cv01152
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MARTIN
Defendant:
STROGERS HOSPITAL and STATE FARM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYNHIER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv03650
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KAREN MYNHIER and MARTY MYNHIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SALESMAN v. YELLOW AMBULANCE SERVICES
as 4:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E. SALESMAN
Defendant:
YELLOW AMBULANCE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
