Torts - Injury Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge William Hussmann Jr.
Cases 31 - 40 of 375
HAVENS v. CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC.
as 4:2009cv00146
NEIDIGE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2009cv00142
LEWIS et al v. DEEL et al
as 3:2009cv00146
Plaintiff: MARY LEWIS and CAROLYN LEWIS
Defendant: PATRICK DEEL, JOHN DEEL and BILLIE DEEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
T.E.B. v. FURMAN et al
as 3:2009cv00143
Plaintiff: B/N/F/ GAIL ECKERT T.E.B.
Defendant: JOHN FURMAN and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CURL et al v. ALCOA INC.
as 3:2009cv00135
Plaintiff: TERRY CURL and MARSHA CURL
Defendant: ALCOA INC.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
PHEGLEY et al v. BOZHINOV et al
as 2:2009cv00317
Plaintiff: DALE PHEGLEY, DALE PHEGLEY, LYNNE E. PHEGLEY and others
Defendant: BOZHIN T. BOZHINOV, GENEZIS SERVICE, INC., CHICAGOTRANS ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury None
MANN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2009cv00134
Plaintiff: PAMALLA K. MANN
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PATTEN v. SHERWIN WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2009cv00313
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. PATTEN
Defendant: SHERWIN WILLIAMS, WAL-MART STORES, INC., BALL AEROSOL& SPECIALTY CONTAINER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RUNGE v. STANLEY FASTENING SYSTEMS, L.P. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00130
Plaintiff: GLEN ANDREW RUNGE
Defendant: STANLEY FASTENING SYSTEMS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
EARLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 3:2009cv00131
Plaintiff: MELINDA EARLEY
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?