Retirement and Survivors Benefits Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Tanya Pratt
Cases 1 - 10 of 67
FAUVERGUE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff: NANCY J. FAUVERGUE
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ELLIOTT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: JULIE A. ELLIOTT
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BECRAFT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01775
Plaintiff: PAULA C. BECRAFT
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LEACH v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff: LAURA M LEACH and LAURA M. LEACH
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ROBINSON v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02404
Plaintiff: MELISSA R ROBINSON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
GILLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02077
Plaintiff: CATHERINE S. GILLE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SMALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff: ARTHUR P. SMALL
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ANDERSON v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff: HENRI D ANDERSON
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BOHM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03098
Plaintiff: RHONDA BOHM
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NOBBE v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02182
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE NOBBE and STEPHANIE I. NOBBE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?