General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,935
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner: DENAR ROYAL
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner: DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner: DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner: JOSHUA W. TISHNER
Respondent: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner: RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRASHEAR v. WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
as 1:2024cv00727
Petitioner: EDWARD BRASHEAR
Respondent: WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner: GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner: LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEHADEH v. USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00151
Petitioner: JAMAL SHEHADEH
Respondent: USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner: DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?