Cases 21 - 30 of 49
FRIESON v. WERNE et al
as 3:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
LASCHON FRIESON
Defendant:
WILLIAM W. GEORGE, C. DEAN HIGGINBOTHAM, EARL PENROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00273
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN T.K. COZZA-RHODES, R.N. MS. DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FURROW v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00190
Defendant:
R. CROOKS, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), CASE MANAGER B. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
BUFORD O'NEAL FURROW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Defendant:
CHURCH, JOHN DOE(S), JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND IV v. SHERIFF ERIC WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2010cv00083
Defendant:
CONFINEMENT OFFICER ELSFELDER, CONFINEMENT OFFICER J. BUGG, FEMALE CONFINEMENT OFFICER SCMITT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPANA v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPANA
Defendant:
STEPHEN DAVIS, J. DHALIWAL, FIVE UNKNOWN FBOP EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Defendant:
L. BREESE, MAUREEN CRUZ, BLAKE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOWE v. MARBERRY
as 2:2010cv00067
:
Defendant:
WARDEN H L MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THURMOND v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
D'ALAN R. THURMOND
Defendant:
H. MARBERRY, B. R. JETT and S. KEILMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
