Cases 71 - 80 of 83
PROWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
ASHAUNTI Q PROWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, INCORPORATED, JULIE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IBRAHIM v. STRONG et al
as 2:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
JIBRIL LUGMAN IBRAHIM
Defendant:
JOHN DOE STRONG, C COIL, D GROSSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHNELL et al v. BINDLEY et al
as 3:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SCHNELL, UNKNOWN JOHN DOE #'S 1-1000 and UNKNOWN JANE DOE #'S 1-1000
Defendant:
ROBERT E. BINDLEY, WHITAKER, RICHARD GUNSELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HOUSTON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
TONY HOUSTON
Defendant:
HELEN MARBERRY, HATTIE SIMS, DAVID YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRANNING v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2008cv00846
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GRANNING
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, MARY MANSFIELD, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. SWEIGART et al
as 1:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEACHER
Defendant:
SWEIGART, JANE DOE, AMY MARCUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WATTS et al
as 2:2007cv00280
Plaintiff:
LEZMOND C. MITCHELL
Defendant:
HERRE WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLY, R. V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. WATTS et al
as 2:2007cv00279
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E BARRETT
Defendant:
HERRE WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLY, R. V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
GILMAN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ELTON AMOS, BRENDA BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHILDS v. RAPOSA et al
as 2:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHILDS
Defendant:
S. RAPOSA, SEAN MCBRIDE, MARTY HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
