Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Case name not on file
as 1:2017mc00022
In Re:
COOK MEDICAL, INC., IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH JANE HILL
Movant:
FRANK LYNCH
FRANCIS et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Defendant:
CHRISTINA BRUNO, EMC MORTGAGE LLC, RANDY EYSTER and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN J. FRANCIS and MICHAEL FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TRAHAN v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP INC., ET AL
as 1:2016cv03161
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KARL TRAHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FISCHER v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02666
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, EDWARD L. HAMBURG and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
