Cases 141 - 150 of 532
HAMBLY v. LOTER
as 1:2018cv03071
Plaintiff:
JEREMY HAMBLY
Defendant:
MATT LOTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE TORO COMPANY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv03026
Defendant:
MATTHEW P. SMITH, MICHAEL D. FLOYD, R. SCOT JONES and others
Plaintiff:
THE TORO COMPANY
DEJESUS et al v. MORRIS INVEST et al
as 1:2018cv02797
Plaintiff:
Li Wang, Anthony Kulczak, Cole Peterson and others
Defendant:
Clayton Morris and Morris Invest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. C & M GIANT TIRE, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00133
Defendant:
KRISTOPHER C. MCDONALD and C & M GIANT TIRE, LLC
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. JAMES MOUSTY CONSTRUCTION
as 4:2018cv00120
Defendant:
JAMES MOUSTY CONSTRUCTION
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. MIDEA AMERICA CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv01653
Defendant:
GD MIDEA AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT and MIDEA AMERICA CORP.
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SUTTON v. SCOTT et al.
as 1:2018cv01573
Defendant:
JOHANNA CHRISTIANSEN and JUVAL SCOTT
Plaintiff:
VARNADOR SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HARRIS v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
DR. DAVID HARRIS, III
Defendant:
ONEMAIN FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
CRUM v. LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC., et al
as 1:2018cv01332
Plaintiff:
WALTER CRUM, III
Defendant:
BETSY DEVOS and LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MIDEA AMERICA CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv01203
Plaintiff:
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC. and MIDEA AMERICA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
