Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
NEWTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA
as 1:2012cv01857
Petitioner: PAUL NEWTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEWTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv01604
Petitioner: PAUL NEWTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEWTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00736
Petitioner: JIUMANEGLIS Q. NEWTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEWTON v. USA
as 1:2012cv00670
Petitioner: PAUL NEWTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LUTTRULL v. BUSS et al
as 3:2009cv00120
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A LUTTRULL
Defendant: EDWIN BUSS, GIL PETERS, RON GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
NEWTON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2009cv00248
Petitioner: PAUL NEWTON
Respondent: CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. PETERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff: ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant: GIL PETERS, RICHARD NEWTON, ALLEN ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
ALLEN v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2009cv00102
Plaintiff: RICKY LEE ALLEN
Defendant: ROBERTS, AL PARKE, GILBERT PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
NEWTON v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
as 2:2009cv00104
Petitioner: LARRY W NEWTON
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONYERS v. VIGO CO SUPERIOR COUT et al
as 2:2009cv00098
Plaintiff: JAMES E CONYERS, JR
Defendant: VIGO CO SUPERIOR COUT, MODESITT, ELDRED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?