Cases 41 - 50 of 53
HARNESS v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00327
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HARNESS
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POE v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00324
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
JIMMIE DARRELL POE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARRADO v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00326
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
MANUEL PARRADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LEANN LARIVA and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. LARIVA
as 1:2014cv01004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Respondent:
LEANNE LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2014cv00093
Respondent:
B.O.P., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LEANNE LARIVA
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. RIVA
as 2:2014cv00039
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Respondent:
LEANNE RIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2014cv00033
Respondent:
BOP, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LEANNE LARIVA and others
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00021
Respondent:
LEANNE LARIVA
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2014cv00011
Respondent:
BOP, DEPARTMENT DEFENDANT OF JUSTICE, LEANNE LARIVA and others
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
