Cases 1 - 5 of 5
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MARTIN, III et al
as 1:2019cv00281
Defendant:
Mr. Fred H. Martin, III, FRED MARTIN FLOORS INC. and FRED H. MARTIN, III
Plaintiff:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND OF NORTH AMERICA, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, et al v. FRED MARTIN FLOORS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03493
Defendant:
FRED MARTIN FLOORS, INC., FRED H. MARTIN, III and FRED H. MARTIN, III
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. FRED MARTIN FLOORS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01863
Defendant:
FRED MARTIN FLOORS, INC. and FRED H. MARTIN, III
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
CARIE et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
STACY M. CARIE, STACY M. CARIE, LE C. HOOK and others
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
