Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00090
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00091
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00086
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00088
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00087
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00089
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FURNEY v. MORRIS
as 2:2013cv00436
Petitioner: BRADLEY E. FURNEY
Respondent: MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COX v. MORRIS
as 2:2013cv00437
Petitioner: ROBERT D. COX
Respondent: MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN v. MORRIS
as 2:2013cv00435
Petitioner: DANIEL L. ALLEN
Respondent: MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELL et al v. MORRIS
as 2:2013cv00352
Petitioner: DANIEL L. ALLEN, GRAYLON D. BELL, ROBERT D. COX and others
Respondent: MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?