Cases 11 - 20 of 34
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2014cv01038
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
EARLS v. WALGREENS
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
SUSAN EARLS
Defendant:
WALGREENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MAHURIN v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
TERRRI MAHURIN
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HOLZMEYER v. WALGREEN INCOME PROTECTION PLAN FOR PHARMACISTS AND REGISTERED NURSES
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLZMEYER
Defendant:
WALGREEN INCOME PROTECTION PLAN FOR PHARMACISTS AND REGISTERED NURSES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LANE v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA G. LANE
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WATTS v. WALGREENS COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00221
Defendant:
WALGREENS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WATTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FONT v. WALGREENS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01723
Defendant:
GREG DAVIDSON and WALGREENS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE G. FONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STEVENS v. WALGREEN CO.
as 4:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
ANNA CATHERINE STEVENS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILSON et al v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2011cv01126
Plaintiff:
ANNECTRICE COPELAND and LATISHA WILSON
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLD v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2010cv01662
Plaintiff:
BARBARA D. GOLD
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
