Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
VASQUEZ v. KNIGHT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01394
Respondent: MS. BLACK, WENDY KNIGHT, MIKE PAVESE and others
Petitioner: JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2013cv01231
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner: JOSE VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOCOCK et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 4:2013cv00109
Plaintiff: GRISELDA AGUIRRE, ROBERTA AYALA, JULIE BOCOCK and others
Defendant: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VASQUEZ-SILVA v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00099
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JOSE VASQUEZ-SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SUBLETT et al v. J SQUARED, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01249
Defendant: J SQUARED, INC. and TERRE VERDE INSTALLATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff: JOHN JOSEPH SUBLETT and VICENTE VASQUEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
VASQUEZ v. STOUT
as 2:2008cv00428
Petitioner: SOVAYDA VASQUEZ
Respondent: JULIE STOUT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VASQUEZ v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00902
Plaintiff: JACKIE VASQUEZ
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ABELMAN et al v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv01554
Plaintiff: PAUL ABELMAN, PAUL ABELMAN, VALERIE R. NUTTER and others
Defendant: COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?