Cases 71 - 80 of 194
CMG WORLDWIDE, INC. v. ADIDAS AG, et al
as 1:2017cv02356
Defendant:
ADIDAS AG, ADIDAS AMERICA, INC. and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
CMG WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
MCBRIDE v. C&J CLARK AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01156
Defendant:
C&J CLARK AMERICA, INC., C&J CLARK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, C&J CLARK MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MCBRIDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RIVERS v. JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
as 1:2016cv03266
Defendant:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHARELL RIVERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
WELKE v. STILES MACHINERY, INC. et al
as 4:2016cv00205
Defendant:
HOMAG MACHINERY NORTH AMERICA, INC. and STILES MACHINERY, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WELKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MASHUP BUDDY, INC. v. LE DUFF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03122
Defendant:
PHIL COSTNER, LAMADELEINE, DE CORPS, INC., LAMADELEINE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MASHUP BUDDY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
